The Perfect Murder Case – Christopher Bush
Published in 1929 when Bush was still writing in his spare time while earning his living as a school teacher and new reissued for a modern readership by Dean Street Press, this is his second book and the second to feature, tangentially, his amateur sleuth, Ludovic Travers. I am reading them in chronological order and only have another sixty-one to go.
It is the ambition of many a murder, all perhaps, is to commit the perfect the murder, one so meticulous and precise in its planning and execution that the murderer will escape all attempts to bring them to justice and force them to dance the hemp jig, as execution by hanging was still the judicial penalty if convicted. Scotland Yard receive a brief note from someone signing themselves as Marius warning the authorities that he is going to commit a murder. More follow giving details of where and when the murder will be committed and despite police precautions Thomas T Richleigh, a disagreeable but rich man, is found dead with a knife protruding from his chest. Marius has struck, but who is the culprit?
The set up for the murder is a classic locked room mystery with doors and windows locked from the inside. Durangos Limited, for whom Travers works and which has a private investigation unit headed by an ex-Scotland Yarder, John Franklin, see the PR value of cracking this seemingly insoluble mystery. They aid, abet and sometimes frustrate the police investigation, led by Superintendent Wharton. As investigations proceed, the suspects are whittled down to Richleigh’s nephews, who will inherit the victim’s estate, but all four seem to have cast-iron alibis.
Structurally, the book has an interesting opening which forms a prologue and plays out three very disparate scenes which, Bush assures us, will enable the attentive reader to piece together the clues which will lead to unmasking the culprit. A nickname and auditions for the part to play a contemporary comedian are crucial to resolving the case. The other interesting structural point is that the identity of the murder is fairly obvious midway through the story and is revealed as such by Bush but the ingenuity of the plotting is revealing how it was committed and obtaining sufficient proof to secure a conviction.
Needless to say, Wharton and Travers achieve this with aplomb, although Travers plays second fiddle in the investigation, content to remain in the background, operating as a sounding board and providing hints as to what avenues to pursue. The establishment of Travers as a criminal-busting super sleuth is clearly a slow-burn of a project. No wonder Bush needed sixty-three books to complete the series.
I found the book an entertaining read and, true to his word, Bush did play fair with the reader in his plotting and in the clues he sprinkled through the narrative and it was possible to work out how it was done. Bush’s style is undemanding, always a difficult trick to pull off, and his characters well-drawn. This was such an engrossing read that I galloped to the end.
Murder is not as easy as it seems. I am looking forward to encountering Travers in his next adventure.